Not Protesters, Just A Mob

Giving a mob the dignity and legitimacy of referring to them as “protesters” just encourages them. A prime example occurred two days ago in New Haven, at the traditional Harvard-Yale game, the culmination of the Ivy League college football season. Personally, I wouldn’t have crossed the street to attend the 136th edition of “The Game,” though I witnessed the most famous of the them all, 1968’s 29-29 tie. Nonetheless, what a bunch of climate-addled demonstrators inflicted on a large group of students and alumni just trying to have a good time enjoying football, traditions, nostalgia and camaraderie  should not be romanticized. The “protesters” are arrogant, disrespectful and anti-democratic jerks. Boola-Boola.

A large mob of Yale Bowl spectators rushed the field at halftime, demanding that Harvard and Yale divest themselves of investments in fossil fuel and energy companies, delaying the start of the second half by nearly an hour, and causing the game to finish in near-darkness. Students from both schools, who didn’t care who they hurt or inconvenienced, rushed to midfield as soon the Yale band finished performing. ( At least they could have done it while the Yale band was performing…)The contest resumed after the Yale police issued 42 summonses for disorderly conduct. But the wasted hour threatened game’s finish:  the Yale Bowl lacks stadium lights, and the game went to double overtime. Yale won just before it became too dark to play.

The Ivy League referred to the protest as “regrettable.” and Yale said that while it “stands firmly for the right to free expression,” it added that “the exercise of free expression on campus is subject to general conditions, and we do not allow disruption of university events.”

So will Yale suspend or expel any of the mob? Of course not.

Protesters that set out to get attention by disrupting the lives of law-abiding citizens engaged in innocent activities are low-level terrorists. They aim to bypass democracy by creating implicit threats, hoping that their adversaries will surrender to just shut them up and avoid the annoyance.

I’ll admit, my attitude toward these kinds of protests was hardened after I missed several weeks of college classes when a small group of militant students took over a building, provoked police, and sparked a strike that shut down the university for most of a month. They demanded divestment too, of investments in defense contractor companies, but their original grievance was that the college allowed students who wanted to prepare for a military career to take ROTC on campus. You know, choices and alliances that the morally superior mob disapproved of. Can’t have that.

Those who want to hold demonstrations to inspire public awareness of an issue have the Constitutional tools to do so.  These unlawful mob actions, in contrast, are the antithesis of democracy, and the way to stop them is to stop treating such protesters as anything but the public nuisances they are.

In Washington, D.C., Jane Fonda is trying to re-live her Hanoi Jane heyday by leading illegal–no permits!—climate change protests. The District isn’t prosecuting her, and it apparently isn’t “the King’s Pass” at work. The D.C. Attorney General’s office is “woke,” and almost never prosecutes protesters, not just celebrities, even when Iraq War protesters lay down in traffic in 2002 and caused thousands of commuters to be hours late for work, and later when the “Occupy” anarchists camped out in Farragut Square.  This, I believe, is an abuse of prosecutorial discretion, unethical both in principle and in its long-term effects, which are to endorse mob action as attempted vetoes over majority rule. It creates the opportunity for risk-free civil disobedience, breaking the law but not having to endure the essential penalty for doing so.

Not all mobs will be regarded equal, of course. Thus demonstrators for conservative causes typically don’t test D.C.’s dedication to equal treatment. They get permits.

14 thoughts on “Not Protesters, Just A Mob

  1. My initial thought upon seeing the headline was the poat was about the second fare jumper mob in NYC recently. Total anarchy. But I guess riding the subway is a human right. And AOC is for that kind of lawlessness and anti-police activity. A member of Congress. A writer of laws. Go figure.

  2. I’m pragmatic to fine them all, big. Protesting is fine but it’s not the least fair to take hostages in collateral damage.

    Tell them to put their money where there mouth is. They can only walk or ride a horse to get to games and protests.(make sure the horse is pampered, no going out in bad weather) No food or goods that are shipped by air or oil using vessels. Cut back their electricity use to the amount their personal solar power panel generates, and no high tech toys or hip imports. Think of the Earth!

    How much energy was wasted by stalling the game? Don’t forget power plants and imported rare earth minerals to run cameras and phones. Protest on one side ot the outside if they must but I am so tired of these niaive protesters who might as well protest about gravity or dihydrogen monoxide.

  3. I remember the so-called university student strikes in the wake of the Cambodian incursion. (I was a 1L student at the time.) It first occured to me that the President didn’t give a hoot one way or the other if I went to class, and second, that failure to use something for which I had already paid wasn’t a strike; it was a boycott.

  4. It would be interesting to interview some who object to these people but support Colin Kaepernick’s “right” to protest at a game….and have them explain why.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.