President Obama’s Epic, Tragic Incompetence: A Review

Obama

I stumbled upon this piece in Commentary by Peter Wehner. At first I was grateful that he had written it so I didn’t have to, and then was struck by the title: The New Obama Narrative: Epic Incompetence. New? This has been the narrative of the entire Obama Presidency, and I have been periodically and grimly drawing attention to that fact, while watching the mainstream media attempt to obscure it, from the very beginning. Now, as the Veteran Administration fiasco finally presents a scandal that Democrats and journalists don’t dare to try to dismiss as, in Dana Milbank’s description of the Benghazi cover-up, a “nothing-burger,” incompetence in the unaccountable, unmanaged, embarrassingly unprofessional Obama Administration is suddenly being pronounced unacceptable. To the contrary, it is because the news media unethically accepted it that the incompetence of this President is finally killing people.

The tragic legacy of Barack Obama will be recorded in three parts: his groundbreaking achievement as the nation’s first black President, his utter incompetence at governing and leadership, and his dishonesty and the dishonesty he engendered by those who reported to him. The first has been fatally undermined by the second and third, and the third, dishonesty, necessitated by the second, the relentless incompetence. The reason this is so tragic should be obvious to all. President Obama, like all trailblazers, needed to be a stand-out, exemplary performer to avoid setting back the causes his ascension needed to advance. But instead of Jackie Robinson, he has been Pumpsie Green, and that may be unfair to Pumpsie, the first black player to wear a Boston Red Sox uniform who knew his limitations, and did the best he could for as long as he could. It is also tragic because America, as much as any time in its history prior to the Civil War, needed a strong, wise, confident, unifying leader to deal with great and difficult problems that will only get worse with time. The challenges would have tested the best of leaders; for President Obama, with neither leadership instincts or talent, they have proven impossible. Worse, the basic requirements of governing have been proven to be beyond him, and he does not have the self-awareness or humility to seek the help he needs.

From Wehner’s piece:

“The emerging narrative of Barack Obama, the one that actually comports to reality, is that he is a rare political talent but a disaster when it comes to actually governing. The list of his failures is nothing short of staggering, from shovel-ready jobs that weren’t so shovel ready to the failures of healthcare.gov to the VA debacle. But it also includes the president’s failure to tame the debt, lower poverty, decrease income inequality, and increase job creation. He promised to close Guantanamo Bay and didn’t. His administration promised to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed before a civilian jury in New York but they were forced to retreat because of outrage in his own party…The White House response to everything from the VA and IRS scandals to the seizure of AP phone records by the Department of Justice is that it learned about them from press reports. More and more Mr. Obama speaks as if he’s a passive actor, a bystander in his own administration, an MSNBC commentator speaking about events he has no real control over. We saw that earlier today, when the president, in trying to address the public’s growing outrage at what’s happening at the VA, insisted he “will not stand for it” and “will not tolerate” what he has stood for and tolerated for almost six years…On every front, he is overmatched by events. It’s painful to watch a man who is so obviously in over his head. And more and more Americans are suffering because of it.”

Just as surprising as the fact that this is still being written as if it were news is that so many pundits, journalists and citizens still deny that the obvious is true. Every agency and department shows evidence of mismanagement, and yet virtually no one is held accountable by the President. He even seems to fail to grasp that such ineptitude is a problem. Asking the Veteran’s Administration to investigate its own scandal, like having Eric Holder’s consiglieri Justice Department investigate “Fast and Furious,” or an Obama political donor to oversee the investigation of the IRS’s misconduct, appears to be a defiant statement that there will be no accountability in the Obama regime, and that only how they play with “the base” matters, not whether the country is governed well. Ron Fournier writes in the National Journal:

“In his speech on the VA, the president said that he would not stand for things that he clearly and undeniably has stood for some years now, and swore that he would not tolerate that which has been tolerating since 2009.  He’s been described as acting like a bystander to his own presidency, but it’s more like he’s a victim of it, as though the presidency were this terrible thing that just happened to him one day that he’s now courageously dealing with…Every time he has some spectacular screw-up, which seems to be about once a quarter, he pronounces himself outraged, as though he had not failed us but had been failed himself. So Barack Obama has sworn that he will not tolerate the incompetence of the Obama administration….”

But, of course, he does. The dishonesty of the Obama Administration, meanwhile, is a long, deep topic for another time. In the interest of perspective, I’m going to recall some of what has appeared on this site regarding the Presidential incompetence that is harming America and Americans in so many ways. I do this not to say “I told you so,” but really to point elsewhere. Not many people read Ethics Alarms, but mainstream journalists had a duty to inform the public, if they were not attentive or smart enough to figure it out themselves, that their President wasn’t up to the job, and that this was, as it always is, dangerous. They didn’t perform that duty; indeed, they denied, aided and abetted the incompetence, and still are. But they knew. They had to know, didn’t they? And if they didn’t, they could have asked me:

From 4/29/13 (The “Red Line” fiasco):

“Not everybody should be a leader, and it is no shame if you have no talent for it.  It is tempting to think that all intelligent, educated, articulate people within a certain range of emotional stability and sanity can learn to be effective leaders, but history and experience tell a different story, and it has many tragic chapters.I know many readers think that I get great joy out of criticizing President Obama for his lack of leadership skills and instincts, but in truth I find myself consciously avoiding writing about this almost every day, because the problem is on display that regularly, and this isn’t a Bash Obama blog. I do find it remarkable that such an obviously intelligent man is so immune to leadership instincts, and that he hasn’t resolved to at least try to learn from his more naturally leadership-gifted predecessors…Yes, I was dubious about Obama’s leadership credentials from his candidacy … because he had literally led nothing, but also hopeful, because other Presidents, not just Lincoln but also JFK and Truman, showed a natural talent for leading once they were in office. Then President Obama began using his predecessor as an excuse for every failure, attacking media figures and outlets by name, injecting himself into local matters and law-enforcement, refusing to hold under-performing or incompetent subordinates accountable for their actions, and eroding his own credibility and likability with gratuitous examples of deceit and dishonesty. Worst of all, he seemed, and seems, incapable of learning from his mistakes, the most damning deficit of all.”

From  9/6/13  (The “Red Line” fiasco): “Congress’s obligation is to do what is in the best interests of the United States of America, not its President. The United States is not made stronger or more credible by its legislature showing that it will authorize deadly force against a sovereign nation simply to save face for an arrogant and incompetent Chief Executive who has already avoided the consequences of his own inept leadership and poor judgment too many times. Allow him to duck accountability again—Obama’s entire tenure has been about ducking accountability—and we will only face a worse consequence of it down the line. This fiasco was inevitable, and I predicted it long ago. The United States of America, not for the first time, but certainly at one of the worst times, has allowed itself to be led by a man who has no instincts or talent for leadership, and worse, appears to be an incurable narcissist. Historians… those who have the integrity, that is…can debate how this came to pass, but for anyone objective, the evidence is conclusive, with the Syria mess the decisive evidence.”

From 10/19/13  (Obamacare): “What is needed is a demonstration that incompetence and failure in the executive branch has consequences, and the signature feature of the Obama years is that there are none. Accountability doesn’t exist. The President doesn’t believe in it, and apparently the American public, again bolstered by a lapdog media, doesn’t comprehend the reason it is essential. That’s the horror, and it is far more disturbing than the failure of the Obamacare site itself.

Presumably, the website and the enrollment system will work eventually. But a government to which the public casually and recklessly cedes more and more of its control over its welfare will become progressively more inefficient, incompetent, expensive, wasteful, foolish, abusive and arrogant and attract leaders and employees who are so inclined if there is not swift and effective accountability for not meeting goals, not keeping promises, not making deadlines, and perpetually blaming external factors and others for poor performance. This is not a partisan complaint. This is Management Ethics 101, Leadership For Tyros, and Success . We have only one national government, and the culture being built from the top from the very first day has been that nobody will ever be held accountable for the failures and fiascos that occur under their oversight, and that no executive will ever be expected to accept responsibility and what naturally follows from responsibility.  No high official has been fired as a result of the I.R.S.’s partisan and illegal activities that have been thoroughly detailed (but barely reported) in the ongoing House hearings. There were no consequences at the State Department as a result of the Benghazi fiasco—other than the Libyan ambassador, that is, who paid with his life. The TSA’s performance has been an ongoing embarrassment, with no high level accountability. Eric Holder has been responsible for multiple fiascos—Fast and Furious, the AP surveillance, the stuttering plans to prosecute terrorists in civil trials, and more—any one of which would have cost previous Attorney Generals their jobs, though most would have had the dignity and self-respect to resign before being sacked. Press Secretary Jay Carney has been dishonest and incompetent in a job that mandates trust, yet he is still in his post. Now the appointee avoiding accountability is Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who has told the House committee investigating the Healthcare.gov website mess as it should, that she will not testify. Of course not. Testifying is part of  accountability, and this Administration’s preferred course is to duck, spin, deny and reject it. That is how President Obama has handled his own accountability issues as well.

Fish. Rots. Head. Down.

And, astoundingly and ominously, the media and the public allow, accept, and therefore encourage this. The Affordable Care Act could be the most brilliant, well-conceived, well-planned and perfectly drafted law in the history of mankind, but if it is entrusted to an inherently untrustworthy government that does not value, accept and execute accountability, it will fail.”

From 5/13/13 (The IRS Scandal): “Contrived ignorance by leaders is the unmistakable brand of a knowingly unethical management structure and culture: “Just do what you have to do to get the job done; don’t tell me about it, don’t ask for permission, and most of all, don’t get caught!” I tell my ethics classes in companies and bar associations that when they hear a supervisor say anything like that, or sense that this is the message employees are getting, their job is to either fix the culture or find another job. Contrived ignorance is how you get Watergate burglaries. It is how Thomas Beckett gets murdered in the cathedral. It is what the Nazi judges used as their defense in the second round of the Nuremberg trials (as portrayed in the Anny Mann film “Judgment at Nuremberg”) , claiming that they enforced the corrupt legal system without understanding the part they were playing in atrocities, because they didn’t want to know. It is how unscrupulous corporate executives squeeze managers into employing unfair labor practices, and then tell authorities that “what they did was certainly not consistent with our policies. We knew nothing about what was going on!”

From 5/19/13 (On incompetency and the scandals): President Obama and Attorney General Holder. Don’t take my word for it, ask them. Each has sworn that he is completely unaware of major initiatives and official misconduct in government departments and agencies over which he has direct control. A probe was underway implicating the I.R.S’s efforts to target conservative groups since early 2012, but the President just heard about it when we did. He repeated the disinformation that the Benghazi attacks were in response to a video before the U.N., but will hold nobody under his supervision responsible for making him an engine of deceit. It’s not just in the areas currently getting most of the headlines, either. The President is Commander-in-Chief for the Armed Forces,  and as any observer of the Democratic National Convention knows, he in the standard bearer for “the party of women.” Yet on his watch, as detailed in a recent Pentagon report, women have received systemic  sexual abuse across the Armed Services at a shocking rate. The results of his non-management of the Executive Branch are evident in other ways as well: HHS Secretary Kathleen Sibelius, who already violated the Hatch Act last election and was given a pass, is now using her position to solicit private support — including from insurance companies — for Enroll America, a nonprofit group devoted to expanding access to health care that a former Obama administration staffer runs.This may be illegal, but is unquestionably unethical. Where’s her supervisor? Oh…right. There are no consequences for poor, inept or corrupt  performance under this passive Chief Executive…”

From December 3, 2013 (On Obamacare): “It gives me no pleasure to say that I saw the signs of this years ago, for years ago there was reason to be hopeful. Presidents learn, most of them, anyway. This one, without any experience to speak of in governing, management, leadership or even organizational process, not only hasn’t learned, but has never shown the slightest recognition that he has anything to learn.The nation, like a crippled ship without a captain, is adrift in a way that it hasn’t experienced since President Franklin Pierce, with the country falling apart around him, sat depressed and drinking in the White House, barely able to function after seeing his young son decapitated before his eyes and witnessing the emotional unraveling of his grief-stricken wife (who seldom left her room and spent her lucid moments writing letters to the spirit of her headless son) in the aftermath. At least poor Pierce had an excuse, and mercifully, he was only in office four years. President Obama has no excuse, and while no civil war is brewing, the consequences of his resolute non-leadership are just beginning to be felt.The smoking gun evidence of leadership and management incompetence is this: nobody, not a single person, has been fired as a consequence of the ACA’s unforgivable state. Just as Noonan and her unnamed friend can’t imagine another President ignoring the management of his own crucial initiative until it started falling apart in chunks, it is unimaginable that an engaged, competent President, indeed any competent leader, CEO, manager, or owner of a small town bakery, would fail to dictate extensive personnel changes swiftly and ostentatiously after a fiasco like this. Yet, incredibly, this is how our nation is being led. This is incompetence. It is unforgivable, it is indefensible, and it is undeniable. And it is terrifying.

Well. I have many more, but this is making me more depressed….even more depressed than wondering what other catastrophic results of the ongoing leadership malpractice await us. You know they are out there, furiously being covered up, until they can’t be covered up any longer. Then the spin starts, the denials, the fake investigations, the attempt to cast blame elsewhere, anywhere. The accusations of racism. It is so sad, and devastating to our confidence, our image, and the nation’s future. We will be suffering from the consequences of this tragedy for decades to come.

______________________________

Pointer: Instapundit

Source: Commentary, The National Journal

30 thoughts on “President Obama’s Epic, Tragic Incompetence: A Review

  1. It doesn’t matter, Jack. He will go down in history as the man who killed bin Laden, won in Libya without any American boots on the ground, pushed gay marriage into a nationwide thing, and created a national healthcare plan, and on top of that he’s BLACK. So zip it, whitey, you know you just can’t stand to see a black man succeed.

      • The last sentence was only half tongue-in-cheek. I work with a fair amount of black staff members and that’s the card they play the moment you level even the mildest criticism at the president. By the rest of the post I was pointing to the fact that academia is laced with liberals and the universities and publishing houses will do their damnedest to burnish Obama’s record and make him out to be a step below the trinity of Washington, Lincoln and FDR. In the end, skin color is the ULTIMATE moral gloss, something I alluded to in another post (one of these days I’ll actually write a whole essay on moral gloss).

        • I’m not quite that cynical. Your colleagues, like most of the public, pick an echo chamber and really don’t know what kind of President Obama is. Historically, failure is pretty hard to airbrush away. Public opinion is something else. JFK will always be ranked by the public as a great President, because he was killed. (Martyrdom is also moral gloss) Historians know better, and with the passing of the JFK hagiographers like Schlesinger, the truth will out. The same with Obama.

          • Martyrdom is also moral gloss, and I will have to add that to the essay when I write it, so thanks for that. I’d amend your statement though, to read that OBJECTIVE historians know better. The history departments of most universities are loaded to the gills with historians who are biased one way or the other and every few years take a six-month sabbatical from telling only their students to churn out a scholarly-sounding, heavily footnoted book to tell the rest of us why this nation sucked before 1960 and only turned the moral corner in 2008.

            • I can confirm. I have several college textbooks fitting exactly that pattern, from professors of history who were exactly as you describe. I’ve known a few good historians, but they were not the majority.

              • You often have to wait about a century before you can find a history that is unbiased. Not only is everyone connected with the events safely dead, but the consequences of what was done can be better analyzed.

          • Just confirmed my recollection:

            “Howard Hughes was called to testify before the Senate War Investigating Committee in 1947 over the use of government funds for the aircraft. During a Senate hearing on August 6, 1947 (the first of a series of appearances), Hughes said:”The Hercules was a monumental undertaking. It is the largest aircraft ever built. It is over five stories tall with a wingspan longer than a football field. That’s more than a city block. Now, I put the sweat of my life into this thing. I have my reputation all rolled up in it and I have stated several times that if it’s a failure, I’ll probably leave this country and never come back. And I mean it.”
            During a break in the Senate hearings, Hughes returned to California to run taxi tests on the H-4.[9] On November 2, 1947, the taxi tests began with Hughes at the controls. His crew included Dave Grant as copilot, two flight engineers, Don Smith and Joe Petrali, 16 mechanics, and two other flight crew. In addition, the H-4 carried seven invited guests from the press corps and an additional seven industry representatives. Thirty-six were on board. After the first two taxi runs, four reporters left to file stories, but the remaining press stayed for the final test run of the day. After picking up speed on the channel facing Cabrillo Beach, the Hercules lifted off, remaining airborne at 70 ft (21 m) off the water at a speed of 135 miles per hour for around a mile (1.6 km). At this altitude, the aircraft still experienced ground effects. Having proven to his detractors that Hughes’ (by now unneeded) masterpiece was flight-worthy, thus vindicating the use of government funds, the “Spruce Goose” never flew again. Its lifting capacity and ceiling were never tested.”

            • The Goose was actually a brilliant concept far ahead of its time. Had it been developed earlier, it would have been able to neatly avoid the U-boat wolfpacks while being able to deliver- at one swat- an entire infantry battalion with its carry-on equipment. But, as you mentioned, by the time it was built, the submarine menace had been largely dealt with and the enormous output of Liberty ships from the Kaiser shipyards had rendered it unnecessary. Two years earlier, it would have re-written history.

  2. I am reminded of Barbara Tuchman’s book, *The March of Folly* which pretty much describes this administration. I blame the media for not doing their job in vetting Obama as a presidential candidate in their obsessive quest to promote the need for a liberal black president.

  3. I’d really like to comment on this post but I hardly know what to say. How many ways and how many times can it be said that “We’re doomed”? Trust in both the Federal government and the media is eroding so fast that I do not believe it will ever recover. The bureaucracy has been so bloated that if we were to fire all of the incompetent, unproductive, lazy, and dishonest employee’s our economy would likely collapse from the massive infusion of unemployed. Every media outlet in existence now has an agenda. Even Fox would like to seen as the People’s Watchdog (O’Reilly, while continuing to make excuses for Obama, claims he is “Watching out for the folks”). We are Asimov’s Empire, but we have no Foundation to rescue us. And I am very much afraid that when we fall, and we will, there’s no one else to step into the vacancy.

  4. I’m not sure I grasp the significance of Obama being the first black president. Racism had already lost the vast majority of its influence in the 90s from what I could tell growing up in that time period. As far as I’m aware, the reason we didn’t have a black president before then was happenstance. I’m pretty sure it wasn’t that people were avoiding voting for black candidates because they were black, and I would be genuinely surprised (and extremely disappointed) if future black candidates were to be rejected simply for being the same ethnicity as Obama.

    Obama’s failure doesn’t demonstrate anything about black people in general, and I don’t think anyone except for a handful of random kooks would even consider that it does. Nothing was actually riding on Obama being black, but because the Democrats think there was, they’re trying to paint him as a saint.

    Then again, maybe I’m just naive. If the Democrats think that Obama being black is significant in the slightest, they may well not be alone.

    • The elitism of the Presidency is pretty much undeniable. Before Obama, no President with what we would call an immediately identifiable ethic name was ever elected, the exception being Eisenhower, whom nobody for a second thought of as German, for obvious reasons. Obama, by some records, was the first brown-eyed President! (Nixon’s eyes are often listed as “black”) No women; no Jews, only one Catholic. Admitting a black member to the club, and to have him elected by a nation dominated by segregation and Jim Crow attitudes just a little more than a half-century earlier—yeah, that’s a big deal, and a major threshold passed through.

      I think you misread human nature. If there has been one leader with any defining characteristic and he is successful, that eliminates any doubts about that characteristic. If there has only been one, say, Vice President who was elected President and he was a flop or a crook (Nixon’s the One), that shadows the next attempt.

      In Obama’s case, the issue is a little different. I don’t think the country can take another black President until the parties and the media stop using race as an excuse and justification for disparate treatment, divisive tactics and race-baiting for political advantage, and until US African Americans start voting on the basis of ability and results rather than group identification. I think the harm this has done to race relations and the nation is incalculable, and yes, I blame Obama, because he could have stopped it, and didn’t.

      His true awfulness as a leader and a President are, frankly, beyond anything I could have imagined.

      • Ah, that makes sense. We’re definitely going to have to clean up this political culture before we can hope for anything good out of the next president.

        Also, for the record, “the reason we didn’t have a black president before then” in my post should have read “the reason we didn’t have a black president between then and Obama.” But I guess it really hasn’t been that long since the days when a black president was considered impossible.

        • 1.) Can’t tell if the first sentence is tongue in cheek. Presumably not.
          2.) Demographically, I doubt that it was possible before 1985-1990. I think Colin Powell could have won the Presidency after the Iraq War, and should have. He’s a moderate conservative, he had leadership ability, and he couldn’t have been half as terrible as Obama under any scenario. His refusal to run, I think, was unpatriotic, and a breach of duty.
          3) A black President was thereafter possible a)if the black statesman was a remarkable, known, universally respected figure (Powell) or b) a charismatic, politically skilled blank slate with weak opposition at a time when the party and President in office were wildly unpopular (Obama). I still don’t think, especially after Obama, that a black equivalent of, say, Carter, Gore or Bush could win. They’d all still get 95% of the black vote, of course, even if they were exposed as child molesters and illegals…

          • Some would say Powell is one of the few sane heads to come out of the GWB administration and they don’t blame him for stepping away and embracing Obama after Bush hung him out to dry at the UN. Powell was, I believe, also hoping to polish his credentials with those who would be writing the history, and thought he could do so best by getting on what was then the winning side.

  5. Sadly, we’ve reached the point where it is far simpler and more efficient to list the agencies that HAVEN’T had a major screwup or scandal. Frankly, I can’t think of any. I must be racist.

  6. The most recent fatality caused by Obama is the CNN message board. They finally shut it down as it was impossible to screen the thousands of negative comments about Obama that were flooding in. In it’s last week, all you saw was “this comment deleted” or “this comment awaiting moderation”. They can’t keep the lie going any longer.

Leave a Reply to Rich Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.